At Disney World, biometric measurements are taken of the fingers of multi-day pass users to ensure that the pass is used by the same person from day to day. Biometrics is the science and technology of authentication (i.e. establishing the identity of an individual) by measuring the person's physiological or behavioral features. The term is derived from the Greek words "bios" for life and "metron" for degree.
In information technology (IT), biometrics usually refers to technologies for measuring and analyzing human physiological characteristics such as fingerprints, eye retinas and irises, voice patterns, facial patterns, and hand measurements, especially for authentication purposes.
Examples of behavioural characteristics which can be measured include signature recognition, gait recognition, speaker recognition and typing recognition.
In a typical IT biometric system, a person registers with the system when one or more of his physiological characteristics are obtained, processed by a numerical algorithm, and entered into a database. Ideally, when he logs in, all of his features match 100%; then when someone else tries to log in, she does not fully match, so the system will not allow her to log in. Current technologies have widely varying Equal Error Rates - as low as 60% and as high as 99.9%.
Accuracy performance and errors
Performance of a biometric measure is usually referred to in terms of the false accept rate (FAR), the false nonmatch or reject rate (FRR), and the failure to enroll rate (FTE or FER).
In real-world biometric systems the FAR and FRR can typically be traded off against each other by changing some parameter. One of the most common measures of real-world biometric systems is the rate at the setting at which both accept and reject errors are equal: the equal error rate (EER), also known as the cross-over error rate (CER). The lower the EER or CER, the more accurate the system is considered to be.
Claimed error rates sometimes involve idiosyncratic or subjective elements. For example, one biometrics vendor set the acceptance threshold high, to minimize false accepts; in the trial, three attempts were allowed, and so a false reject was counted only if all three attempts failed. Another example: when measuring performance biometrics (e.g. writing, speech etc.), opinions may differ on what constitutes a false reject. If I train a signature verification system using my initial and surname, can I legitimately claim a false reject when it then rejects my first name and surname?
Despite these misgivings, biometric systems have the potential to identify individuals with a very high degree of certainty. Forensic DNA evidence enjoys a particularly high degree of public trust at present (ca. 2004) and substantial claims are being made in respect of iris recognition technology, which has the capacity to discriminate between individuals with identical DNA.
Dangers
As with many interesting and powerful developments of technology, excessive concern with the biometric may have the effect of eclipsing a more general critical faculty. Biometrics may become associated with severe miscarriages of justice if bedazzlement with the performance of the technology blinds us to the following possibilities, where an individual could:
- plant DNA at the scene of the crime
- associate another's identity with his biometrics, thereby impersonating without arousing suspicion
- fool a fingerprint detector by using a piece of sticky tape with an authentic fingerprint on it
- fool an iris recognition camera by showing a photo of anothers iris
- interfere with the interface between a biometric device and the host system, so that a "fail" message gets converted to a "pass".
Identity theft
Identity theft concerns about biometrics use have not been resolved. If a person's credit card number is stolen, for example, it can cause them great difficulty. If their iris scan is stolen, though, and it allows someone else to access personal information or financial accounts, the damage could be irreversible. Often, biometric technologies have been rolled out without adequate safeguards for personal information gathered about individuals.
Privacy concerns
Though biometrics often are touted as a way to restrict criminality, privacy advocates fear biometrics may be used to diminish personal liberties of law abiding citizens as well.
Developments in digital video, infrared, x-ray, wireless, global positioning satellite systems, biometrics, image scanning, voice recognition, DNA, and brain wave fingerprinting provide government with new ways to "search" individuals and collect vast databases of information on law-abiding members of the public.
US Constitution
Framers of the U.S. Constitution never thought about these kinds of "searches" when drafting the Fourth Amendment, but as technology advances, we have to think about them now.
History of Biometrics
The first effective biometrics system was the anthropometric system designed by Alphonse Bertillon in 1883, the first precise, scientific system widely used to identify criminals. It worked by precisely measuring certain lengths and widths of the head and body. Due to problems with differing methods of measurement and changing measurements, however, it was supplanted by fingerprinting.
See also
Stub for BioAPI
External links
|
