|
Correlative based fallacies - Definition and Overview |
|
|
|
|
In logic, correlative based fallacies, also known as fallacies of distraction, are logical fallacies based on correlative conjunctions.
A correlative conjunction is a relationship between two statements where one must be false and the other true. In formal logic this is known as the exclusive or relationship. Examples of correlatives are:
- A: Object one is larger than object two.
- B: Object one is smaller or the same size as object two.
- A: Fido is a dog.
- B: Fido is not a dog.
Fallacies based on correlatives include:
- The false dilemma or false correlative. Here something which is not a correlative is treated as a correlative, excluding some other valid possibility.
- The fallacy of denying the correlative, where an attempt is made to introduce some other invalid option into what is a true correlative.
- The fallacy of suppressed correlative, where the definitions of a correlative are changed so that one of the options includes the other, making one option impossible.
- The false choice, in which options are presented as being exclusive, when that is not the case.
|
|
Example Usage of Correlative |
 |
afmaris: Receptor Binding Domain changes at 225 may be Correlative to fatal outcomes in Brasil as 100% of these cases appear to have expired (4/4). |
 |
YeahButStill: Stress has been proven to be Correlative with financial security; ease of mind comes at a price. |
 |
Raja_Rajan: @Khairykj firm up a Correlative policy between gas subsidies & prices,stop talking like subsidising us with our own $ is reason 2b grateful |
|