![]() |
|
|
| |
|
||||
Cryptozoology is the study of rumored or mythological animals that are presumed to exist, but for which conclusive proof does not yet exist; or are generally considered extinct, but occasionally reported. Those who study or search for such animals are called cryptozoologists. Invention of the term is usually attributed to zoologist Bernard Heuvelmans; he traced the scholarly origins of the discipline to Anthonid Cornelis Oudemans and his 1892 study, The Great Sea Serpent. The hypothetical creatures involved are referred to by some as "cryptids". Some cryptozoologists align themselves with a more scientifically rigorous field like zoology, while others tend toward an anthropological slant or even a fortean perspective. The fringes of cryptozoology are often considered pseudoscience by mainstream biologists.
Mainstream reactionWhile many cryptozoologists strive for legitimacy and many are respected scientists in other fields, and though discoveries of previously unknown animals are often subject to great attention, cryptozoology per se has never been fully embraced by the scientific community. Recently, however, Henry Gee, editor of the prestigious journal Nature, writes that "cryptozoology ... the study of such fabulous creatures, can come in from the cold" [1] (http://www.nature.com/news/2004/041025/full/041025-2.html) due to the unexpected and startling discovery of Homo floresiensis; further details below. A cryptozoologist may propose that an interest in such a phenomenon does not entail belief, but a detractor will reply that accepting unsubstantiated sightings is itself a belief. Cryptozoologists tend to be responsible for disproving their own objects of study. For example, some cryptozoologists have collected statistical data and studied witness accounts that challenge the validity of many Bigfoot sightings. Scientists have demonstrated that some creatures of mythology, legend or local folklore were rooted in real animals or phenomena. Thus, cryptozoologists hold that people should be open to the possibility that many more such animals exist. In the early days of western exploration of the world, many native tales of unknown animals were initially dismissed as mythology or superstition by western scientists, but consequently proven to have a real basis in biological fact. Cryptozoologists often point out that natives often know a great deal more about their immediate environment (and the animals that inhabit it) than western investigators, and therefore suggest that, even today, thus far unproven tales and traditions regarding unknown undescribed animals in native folklore should not be summarily dismissed in the same way. There are several animals cited as examples for continuing cryptozoological efforts:
Georges Cuvier's so-called "Rash Dictum" is sometimes cited as a reason that researchers should avoid "rash" conclusions: In 1821, Cuvier remarked that it was unlikely for any large, unknown animal to be discovered. Many such discoveries have been made since Cuvier's statement. Along similar lines, the emblem of the Society for Cryptozoology is the okapi, a forest-dwelling relative of the giraffe that was unknown to Western scientists prior to 1901. Notable topics of interest in cryptozoologyPrimates and man-apes
Little peopleBipedal monsters
Carnivorous mammals
Herbivorous mammals
Sea and lake monsters
Reptiles
BirdsPlantsOthersGeneral terms for cryptids
See also
Related studies: Due to some fields of study in cryptozoology, see also pseudoscience and protoscience. External links
da:Kryptozoologi de:Kryptozoologie fr:Cryptozoologie it:Criptozoologia nl:Cryptozoölogie ja:未確認動物学 pl:Kryptozoologia pt:criptozoologia ru:Криптозоология sl:kriptozoologija sv:Kryptozoologi |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2008 WordIQ.com - Privacy Policy
::
Terms of Use
:: Contact Us
:: About Us This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Cryptozoology". |