meanings of Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education encyclopedia of Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education dictionary of Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education thesaurus on Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education books about Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education dreams about Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education
 Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education - Definition 

Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education, 175 U.S. 528 (1899) was a case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States. It is a landmark case, for it allowed the segregation of races in American schools. The Supreme Court overturned their decision in Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).

In 1897, the board levied a tax in Richmond County, Georgia. With this tax it supported only the white schools. Colored parents and tax payers objected to this tax, and filed a lawsuit. The case was fought in Georgia up to the supreme court of Georgia, after that it came before the federal Supreme Court to rule on the constitutionality of the tax law.

The case was lost by the plaintiffs, and this decision gave legal standing to the segregation of schools.

The decision defends this, among others, with an economic argument. It claims that there are much more colored children than white children in that area. And schooling could not be afforded for everybody. Hence it framed the decision to be a choice between education 60 white children or no education for anybody.

The constitutional issues were dealt with simply by referring to the state. Quoting from the decision:

"Under the circumstances disclosed, we cannot say that this action of the state court was, within the meaning of the Fourteenth Amendment, a denial by the state to the plaintiffs and to those associated with them of the equal protection of the laws or of any privileges belonging to them as citizens of the United States, .... the education of the people in schools maintained by state taxation is a matter belonging to the respective states, and any interference on the part of Federal authority with the management of such schools cannot be justified except in the case of a clear and unmistakable disregard of rights secured by the supreme law of the land."


The 'hostility to the colored population' is addressed in the final remark as follows:


"If, in some appropriate proceeding instituted directly for that purpose, the plaintiffs had sought to compel the board of education, out of the funds in its hands or under its control, to establish and maintain a high school for colored children, and if it appeared that the board's refusal to maintain such a school was in fact an abuse of its discretion and in hostility to the colored population because of their race, different questions might have arisen in the state court."

See also

External links




Copyright 2008 WordIQ.com - Privacy Policy  ::  Terms of Use  :: Contact Us  :: About Us
This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Cumming v. Richmond County Board of Education".