![]() |
|
|
| |
|
||||
The fundamental theorem of calculus is the statement that the two central operations of calculus, differentiation and integration, are inverses of each other. This means that if a continuous function is first integrated and then differentiated, the original function is retrieved. This theorem is of such central importance in calculus that it deserves to be called the fundamental theorem for the entire field of study. An important consequence of this, sometimes called the second fundamental theorem of calculus, allows one to compute integrals by using an antiderivative of the function to be integrated. James Stewart (2003, 394) of McMaster University credits the English mathematician Isaac Barrow for originating the idea that led to the fundamental theorem.
IntuitionIntuitively, the theorem simply says that the sum of infinitesimal changes in a quantity over time (or some other quantity) add up to the net change in quantity. To get a feeling for the statement, we will start with an example. Suppose a particle travels in a straight line with its position given by x(t) where t is time. The derivative of this function is equal to the infinitesimal change in x per infinitesimal change in time (of course, the derivative itself is dependent on time). Let us define this change in distance per time as the speed v of the particle. In Leibniz's notation:
Rearranging that equation, it is clear that:
By the logic above, a change in x, call it <math>\Delta x<math>, is the sum of the infinitesimal changes dx. It is also equal to the sum of the infinitesimal products of the derivative and time. This infinite summation is integration; hence, the integration operation allows the recovery of the original function from its derivative. Clearly, this operation works in reverse as we can differentiate the result of our integral to recover the speed function. ProofThis is a limit proof by Riemann Sums. <math>\int_{b}^{a} f(x)\,dx = F(b) - F(a)<math>, where <math>F(x)<math> is the antiderivative of <math>f(x)<math>. Have <math>a = x_0 < x_1 < x_2 < \ldots < x_{n-1} < x_n = b<math>, so that: <math>F(b) - F(a) = F(x_n) - F(x_0) \,<math> Now, we add and subtract the same quantity so that: <math>F(x_n) - F(x_0) = F(x_n) - F(x_{n-1}) + F(x_{n-1}) - \ldots - F(x_1) + F(x_1) - F(x_0)<math> <math>= \sum_{i=1}^n [F(x_i) - F(x_{i-1})]<math>
<math>= \sum_{i=1}^n [F'(c_i)(x_i - x_{i-1})]<math> As the derivative of the antiderivative is the original function, <math>F'(c_i) = f(c_i)<math>. Also, <math>x_i - x_{i-1}<math> can be expressed as <math>\Delta x<math> of partition <math>i<math>. <math>= \sum_{i=1}^n [f(c_i)(\Delta x_i)]<math> Notice that we are describing the area of a rectangle, with the width times the height, and we are adding the areas together. Each rectangle, by virtue of the Mean Value Theorem, describes an approximation of the curve section it is drawn over. Also notice that <math>\Delta x_i<math> does not need to be the same for any value of <math>i<math>, or in other words that the width of the rectangles can differ. What we have to do is approximate the curve with <math>n<math> rectangles. Now, as the size of the partitions get smaller and n increases, resulting in more partitions to cover the space, we will get closer and closer to the actual area of the curve. By taking the limit of the expression as the norm of the partitions approaches zero, we arrive at the Riemann integral. That is, we take the limit as the largest of the partitions approaches zero in size, so that all other partitions are smaller and the number of partitions approaches infinity. <math>\lim_{\| \Delta \| \to 0} \sum_{i=1}^n [f(c_i)(\Delta x_i)] \equiv \int_{b}^{a} f(x)\,dx<math> Formal statementsStated formally, the theorem says: If the function g(x) is continuous on some interval [a, b], then there exist infinitely many antiderivatives G(x) whose derivatives are g(x). If the function f' (x) is continuous on some interval [p, q] and f(x) is one of its antiderivatives, then As an example, suppose you need to calculate
Here, <math>f(x) = x^2<math> and we can use <math>F(x) = (1/3) x^3<math> as antiderivative. Therefore:
GeneralizationsWe don't need to assume continuity of f on the whole interval. Part I of the theorem then says: if f is any Lebesgue integrable function on <math>[a, b]<math> and <math>x_0<math> is a number in <math>[a, b]<math> such that <math>f<math> is continuous at <math>x_0<math>, then
is differentiable for <math>x = x_0<math> with <math>F'(x_0) = f(x_0)<math>. We can relax the conditions on f still further and suppose that it is merely locally integrable. In that case, we can conclude that the function F is differentiable almost everywhere and F'(x)=f(x) almost everywhere. This is sometimes known as Lebesgue's differentiation theorem. Part II of the theorem is true for any Lebesgue integrable function f which has an antiderivative F (not all integrable functions do, though). The version of Taylor's theorem which expresses the error term as an integral can be seen as a generalization of the Fundamental Theorem. There is a version of the theorem for complex functions: suppose U is an open set in C and f: U -> C is a function which has a holomorphic antiderivative F on U. Then for every curve γ : [a, b] -> U, the curve integral can be computed as
The fundamental theorem can be generalized to curve and surface integrals in higher dimensions and on manifolds. The most powerful statement in this direction is Stokes' theorem. References
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2008 WordIQ.com - Privacy Policy
::
Terms of Use
:: Contact Us
:: About Us This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Fundamental theorem of calculus". |