![]() |
|
|
| |
|
||||
Logical conjunction (usual symbol and) is a logical operator that results in true if both of the operands are true.
DefinitionIn logic and technical fields that use it, conjunction, or and, is a logical operator in logical calculi, and a rule of inference in deductive systems. The result of conjoining two propositions is also called their conjunction. The conjunction is true if both of the combined propositions are true; else it is false. For two inputs A and B, the truth table of the operator is as follows.
For example, consider:
If x is 36, then x > 13 is true, but x < 27 is false, so this sentence is false. But if x is 20, then both parts of the sentence are true, so the entire conjunction is also true. The analogue of conjunction for a (possibly infinite) family of statements is universal quantification, which is part of predicate logic. As a rule of inference Conjunction is a valid, simple argument form:
or in logical operator notation:
The argument form has two premises. The first premise is the left conjunct, the second premise the right conjunct. From these two premises it can be logically concluded that A and B, must be true as well. Here is an example of an argument that fits the form conjunction:
Associativity and commutativityOne can also chain conjunctions, such as A AND B AND C, which is logically equivalent both to (A AND B) AND C and to A AND (B AND C). This statement is true if A, B, and C are simultaneously true. In fancier language, conjunction is associative. It's also commutative; A AND B is the same as B AND A. SymbolThe symbol "<math>\land<math>" is typically used for conjunction, and "P <math>\land<math> Q" is read "P and Q". The word "AND" in all-caps is also used, and the ordinary English word "and" is probably most common of all. Bitwise operationLogical conunction is often used for bitwise operations. Examples:
"But"A minor issue of logic and language is the role of the word "but". Logically, the sentence "it's raining, but the sun is shining" is equivalent to "it's raining, and the sun is shining", so logically, "but" is equivalent to "and". However, in natural language, "but" and "and" are semantically distinct. The former sentence suggests that the latter sentence is usually a contradiction. One way to resolve this problem of correspondence between symbolic logic and natural language is to observe that the first sentence (using "but"), implies the existence of a hidden but mistaken assumption, namely that the sun doesn't shine when it rains. That implication captures the semantic difference of "and" and "but" without disturbing their logical equivalence. On the other hand, in Brazilian logic, the logical equivalence is broken between A BUT NOT B (where "BUT NOT" is a single operator) and A AND (NOT B), which is a weaker statement. See Also:
de:Konjunktion (Logik) it:AND ja:論理積 pl:AND pt:E (lgica) fr:Conjonction_logique |
|||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2008 WordIQ.com - Privacy Policy
::
Terms of Use
:: Contact Us
:: About Us This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Logical NOT". |