Court order awarding child custody to mother, visitation rights to father.
Court order restricting divorcing parties' use of financial assets
Court order mandating child support payments
Marriage strike is a social movement motivated mostly by men, whereby they vocally express intentions of never marrying. This movement has been compared to a strike action, but it is in abstract institution rather than a specific firm the "strikers" protest. Measures similar to marriage strikes have been initiated by both men and women since the 1960s.
Reasons
People "marriage strike" for varying reasons: the most common is the difficulty and possible loss, both financial and social, that accompanies divorce proceedings. Divorce can be very costly for both parties, given the price of legal services and attorneys.
There is a perception among some men that divorce courts favor women, and generally no dispute that women are favored in custody battles. Marriage striker Matthew Weeks says, "If we accept the old feminist argument that marriage is slavery for women, then it is undeniable that -- given the current state of the nation's family courts -- divorce is slavery for men."
In the United States, 50 percent (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/divorce.htm) of marriages end in divorce. In states with no fault divorce laws, 2/3 of divorces are initated by the wife (http://health.discovery.com/centers/loverelationships/articles/divorce.html). The father (or the mother) may lose custody of the child. The parent denied custody is required to support the child financially, but often has no control over how the payments are spent, nor guarantee that they will be spent on the child. Those who oppose child support and alimony law liken this to an unjust transfer payment; others support these payments on the grounds that they protect the woman's rights. For example, a woman might forgo career opportunities in a marriage, and alimony is the only way to offset her loss of earnings. The losing parent of a custody battle may also have his or her visitation rights restricted or denied. In extreme cases, parents are tried for kidnapping after violating these restrictions, even when there was no danger to the child.
Some marriage strikers assert that family judges, divorce attorneys, and government enforcement agencies are biased against men. In some cases, fathers are allowed only to visit two days out of fourteen, yet expected to take an equal role in the financial support of the child. In some cases, up to half of a person's income can be garnished for child support and alimony. In some cases, an order of protection can be issued threatening the father, if he is unable to pay for the child, with imprisonment.
See also
Research
External Links
- The National Marriage Project (http://marriage.rutgers.edu/publicat.htm) -- Academic research and analysis supporting marriage strike from Rutgers University
- Americans for Divorce Reform (http://www.divorcereform.org/) -- Cultural and legislative efforts to reduce divorce
- Stephen Baskerville, PhD (http://www.stephenbaskerville.net/) -- Insightful writings on the drivers of the movement, divorce industry
- Eagle Forum (http://www.eagleforum.org/column/) -- Collection of pro-family articles that sympathize marriage strikers
- Unity in the Body of Christ (http://www.unityinchrist.com/marriage_strike.htm)
- Matthew 19:1-12 (http://bible.gospelcom.net/passage/?search=Matt%2019:1-12;&version=47;/) Biblical perspective on marriage, divorce, and men avoiding divorce.
- The Marriage Strike (http://www.mattweeks.com/strike.htm) - Matthew Weeks explains his reasons for "marriage strike".
Further Reading
|