![]() |
|
|
| |
|
||||
The term new, or modern anti-Semitism was coined at the outset of the 21st century to describe waves of attacks around the globe directed at Jews and Jewish institutions. Core themes of the phenomenon include:
Many attacks were commited by Islamists in Europe, and some were explained on the ground of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
Classification attemptsIn his article Human Rights and the New Anti-Jewishness (http://frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=12191), Irwin Cotler, the Minister of Justice for Canada, writes:
Missing image FrenchCemetery103004-01.jpg Neo-Nazi defacement of a Jewish cemetery in France Cotler noted six categories and thirteen indices of modern anti-Semitism:
Anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism
Anti-Zionism is a term that has been used to describe several very different political and religious points of view (both historically and in current debates), all expressing some form of opposition to Zionism. A large variety of commentators believe that criticisms of Israel and Zionism are often disproportionate in degree and unique in kind, and attribute this to anti-Semitism. In turn, critics of this view believe that associating anti-Zionism with anti-Semitism is intended to stifle debate, deflect attention from valid criticisms, and taint anyone opposed to Israeli actions and policies. They point out that, during debate over the establishment of the State of Israel, most notably, many Hassidic Jews considered this manifestation of Zionism heretical. Today, the number of anti-Zionist Jewish groups worldwide is small, and they are small in number. Straw-man anti-SemitismOne common form of anti-Jewish hostility is an allegation that "Jews claim that all criticism of the State of Israel is anti-Semitism". This allegation is then used to criticise Jewish groups as unreasonable, overly anxious or unable to withstand criticism. However, no Jewish groups officially hold such a position. This position has never been held, in any form, by any of the modern Jewish denominations. In fact, on numerous occasions many Jewish groups have publicly criticised the policies of different Israeli governments. Further, these Jewish groups are aware of many criticism by non-Jewish groups, and have not considered the majority of these criticisms as anti-Semitic. Public statements by leaders of many Jewish groups explicitly state that disagreement with a policy or government of the State of Israel is not, of itself anti-Semitic. One popular understanding of this issue can be found in a statement by the Anti-Defamation League:
In his speech (http://www.frontpagemagazine.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=13590) given at Berkeley University on April 29, 2004, Law Professor at Harvard University Law School Alan Dershowitz said, in particular: "Show me a single instance where a major Jewish leader or Israeli leader has ever said that criticizing a particular policy of Israeli government is anti-Semitic. That's just something made up by Israel's enemies." Manifestations of the new anti-SemitismFalse allegationsPerhaps the most notable case was the so called "Jenin massacre" allegation, in which it was claimed that in Jenin Israel Defense Force committed atrocities "horrific beyond belief" (according to United Nations special envoy Terje Roed-Larsen [1] (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/1937048.stm)) and "massacred" 500-3000 innocent Palestinians during Operation Defensive Shield. Two weeks after the press was promoting the Jenin massacre allegation, international reporters uncovered that no massacre took place in Jenin. Fatah lowered its estimation for the death toll to 56 people, the majority of whom were combatants, and in the battle, 23 IDF soldiers were killed. The "Jenin massacre" story sparked waves of anti-Israeli protests and violent attacks against Jews in Europe, and was regarded by many Jews as a modern blood libel. In the Arab media, conspiracy theories involving Jews are abound: "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, a text debunked many years ago as a fraud perpetrated by Czarist intelligence agents, continued to appear in the Middle East media, not as a hoax, but as established fact. Government-sponsored television in Syria ran lengthy serials based on the Protocols. The presentations emphasized blood libel and the alleged control by the Jewish community of international finance. The clear purpose of the programs was to incite hatred of Jews and of Israel. Copies of the Protocols and other similar anti-Semitic forgeries were readily available in Middle Eastern countries, former Soviet republics and elsewhere. Similarly, allegations that Jews were behind the 9/11 attacks were widely disseminated." (1, see also Zionist conspiracy theories regarding the September 11, 2001 attacks) Such media channels often broadcast globally and incite attacks against Jews. On December 2004, the French court banned Hizbullah's TV channel Al-Manar after repeated anti-Semitic attacks and allegations such as "Zionist attempts to transmit AIDS to Arab countries" [2] (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4093579.stm). Antisemitic cartoonsThe U.S. State Department report 1 on Global Anti-Semitism describes the rise of anti-Semitic cartoons in Western media as a symptom of growing antisemtisim:Critics of Israel frequently use anti-Semitic cartoons depicting anti-Jewish images and caricatures to attack the State of Israel and its policies, as well as Jewish communities and others who support Israel. These media attacks can lack any pretext of balance or even factual basis and focus on the demonization of Israel. The United States is frequently included as a target of such attacks, which often assert that U.S. foreign policy is made in Israel or that Jews control the media and financial markets in the United States and the rest of the world. During the 2004 United States presidential campaign, the Arab press ran numerous cartoons closely identifying both of the major American political parties with Israel and with Israeli Prime Minister Sharon. In one case, British daily, The Independent, depicted the Israeli prime minister Ariel Sharon eating a Palestinian baby. The cartoon (http://homepage.mac.com/cfj/.Pictures/independent-sharon-toon.jpg), drawn by Dave Brown and based on the painting Saturn Devouring one of his children (http://www.artchive.com/galleries/goya/saturn_zoom1.html) by Goya, appeared whilst Sharon was seeking re-election in Israel and sparked a wave of protests from the Israeli embassy and Jewish human rights group. Critics accused the cartoonist of incitement and anti-Semitism. "This cartoon conjures up the horrific medieval antisemitic 'Blood Libel' and is more in keeping with the tradition of the Nazi paper 'Der Stürmer'," lamented Rabbi Abraham Cooper, Associate Dean of the Simon Wiesenthal Center ([3] (http://www.wiesenthal.com/social/press/pr_item.cfm?ItemId=7135)). Despite the protests, the cartoon was selected as "Cartoon of the year of 2003" [4] (http://www.indymedia.org.uk/en/regions/london/2003/11/282111.html). The Independent's editor and the cartoonist denied that the cartoon was anti-Semitic and claimed it was just "anti-Sharon", and the British Press Complaints Commission ruled against the complaints. [5] (http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,2763,961357,00.html) Desecration of synagogues and cemeteriesPhysical violenceReactions and responsesPosition of the United StatesOn December 30, 2004, the US Department of State published its annual Report1 on Global Anti-Semitism, in accordance with Section 4 of PL 108-332. The report's summary says: "The increasing frequency and severity of anti-Semitic incidents since the start of the 21st century, particularly in Europe, has compelled the international community to focus on anti-Semitism with renewed vigor." The "four main sources" of the phenomenon were identified:
The report contains major incidents, trends and actions taken around the world in the period between July 1, 2003 and December 15, 2004. Position of the European UnionGroups monitoring hatespeech and violence in the European Union have noted an upswing in attacks on Jewish people and Jewish institutions in many European countries. The Interior Minister of France has announced that the number of anti-Semitic attacks in France in 2004 is more than double that of the same period in 2003 ([6] (http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=worldNews&storyID=6090896§ion=news)). In September 2004, The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance, a part of the Council of Europe, called on its member nations to "ensure that criminal law in the field of combating racism covers anti-Semitism" and to penalize intentional acts of public incitement to violence, hatred or discrimination, public insults and defamation, threats against a person or group, and the expression of anti-Semitic ideologies. It urged member nations to "prosecute people who deny, trivialize or justify the Holocaust". The report said it was Europe's "duty to remember the past by remaining vigilant and actively opposing any manifestations of racism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism and intolerance... Anti-Semitism is not a phenomenon of the past and... the slogan 'never again' is as relevant today as it was 60 years ago." ([7] (http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1095650548542)) According to a study by Pew Research Center link?, in some European countries there has been a recent decrease in some forms of anti-Semitism. Position of the United NationsMany Jewish groups have been disappointed with the role of the United Nations in regards to the treatment of Jews; many Jewish groups and writers have stated that the actions of the United Nations have often implicitly condoned, or encouraged, anti-Semitism. (more to come.) The United Nations Secretary-General Kofi Annan stated on June 21, 2004: "It is hard to believe that 60 years after the tragedy of the Holocaust, anti-Semitism is once again rearing its head. But it is clear that we are witnessing an alarming resurgence of these phenomena in new forms and manifestations. This time the world must not, cannot, be silent." Anan then asked UN member states to adopt a resolution to fight anti-Semitism, and stated that the UN's Commission on Human Rights must study and expose anti-Semitism in the same way that it fights bias against Muslims. Anan stated "Are not Jews entitled to the same degree of concern and protection?" [8] (http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1087855809804&call_pageid=968332188854&col=968350060724), [9] (http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1087787670464) Anne Bayefsky, a preeminent Canadian Human Rights activist, has addressed the UN specifically on this matter on the same day:
According to Lawrence H. Summers, the current president of Harvard University, "The United Nations-sponsored World Conference on Racism - while failing to mention human rights abuses in China, Rwanda, or anyplace in the Arab world - spoke of Israel’s policies prior to recent struggles under the Barak government as constituting ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity. The NGO declaration at the same conference was even more virulent." [11] (http://www.president.harvard.edu/speeches/2002/morningprayers.html) Jewish reactionsThe Anti-Defamation League stated that: "The events of September 11, the American campaign against terrorism and the Palestinian intifada against Israel have created a dangerous atmosphere in the Middle East and Europe, one that 'gives anti-Semitism and hate and incitement a strength and power of seduction that it has never before had in history.'" Views of Natan SharanskyNatan Sharansky has suggested that anti-Semitism masquerading as anti-Zionism can be distinguished from legitimate criticism of Israel if it fails the "3D" test, as follows:
References
See alsoExternal LinksReports
Organizations and forums that fight anti-Semitism
Articles about the new antisemitism
Miscellaneous
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2008 WordIQ.com - Privacy Policy
::
Terms of Use
:: Contact Us
:: About Us This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Modern anti-Semitism". |