|
he says:
"moreover if people could opt out of moral responsibility, wouldn't they have to be locked up like dangerous animals"
yet this is precisely what *does* happen doesn't it??
Needs some NPOV work.
Yeah, it's based too heavily on the original authors interaction with the book. -- (not logged in)
Wow.. it doesn't just need SOME NPOV, it needs to be rewritten entirely. The whole article is the author's biased opinion, both against the philosophy and the man. -Augur
where's the "E" word?
The current article is amazing....probably the only description of this book that does not discuss the importance of evolution in Dennett's argument (mentioning "evolves" in the title of the book does not count). 68.109.166.14 02:43, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
|
