![]() |
|
|
| |
|
||||
The Gulf War Did Not Take Place is a book by Jean Baudrillard - a translation of 3 essays published in Liberation between January and March 1991. Contrary to the provocative title, the author does believe that the events and violence of the 'Gulf War' actually took place. Baudrillard argues that the style of warfare used in the 'Gulf War' was so far removed from previous standards of warfare that it existed more as images on radar and TV screens than as actual hand-to-hand combat, that most of the decisions in the war were based on perceived intelligence coming from maps and images and news, than from actual seen-with-the-eye intelligence (Baudrillard 2001, 29-30). Most provocatively, Baudrillard argues that the startlingly one-sided nature of the conflict (fewer US soldiers were killed in this 'war' than would have died in traffic accidents had they stayed at home) means that it should not be seen as a war: the US-lead coalition could not engage with the Iraqi army or take the kind of risks that constitute war (Baudrillard 1995, 69). The US-lead coalition was fighting a virtual war while the Iraqis tried to fight a 'traditional' one - the two could not entirely meet (Baudrillard 1995, 69). A great deal of violence took place, but the 'Gulf War' did not; rather than belittling the effects of this violence this means that the 'Gulf War' should be seen not as a war but as "an atrocity masquerading as war" (Merrin 1994, 447) Military officials have confirmed that the USA did not truly consider Iraq to be a threat before the latter's invasion of Kuwait, and thus had almost no agents or contacts on the ground. Almost every bit of intelligence America received leading up to the war was from the aerial photographs, and from asking leaders of nearby nations. One of the points that Baudrillard tries to make with this book is that what's considered real is now simply images of what's real: we see "a masquerade of information: branded faces delivered over to the prostitution of the image, the image of an unintelligible distress." (Baurdrillard 2001, 40) This is a challenge to the tendency of many people to absolutely believe what they see on their screens. This point also works in with another of Baudrillard claims that the war was so heavily edited when it was shown on television, that what Americans saw wasn't even close the real war. He arrived at this conclusion after talking with many soldiers about what really happened on the ground. All this finally comes back to the title of the book which we now see as his claim that, despite the massive bloodshed in the Gulf in 1991, no war took place there. That the 'Gulf War' did not take place (and, one could argue, is still not taking place) is an important and controversial point to make, although this will be of little comfort to those who were killed and wounded in the course of the its not happening. BibliographyBaudrillard,Jean (1995) trans. Paul Patton The Gulf War Did Not Take Place (Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1995) Baudrillard, Jean (2001) 'The Gulf War Did Not Take Place' [edited excerpt] trans. Paul Patton in Jean Baudrillard: Selected Writings (2nd Edition) (Cambridge: Polity Press) Merrin, William (1994) 'Uncritical Criticism? Norris, Baudrillard and the Gulf War' in Economy and Society (Vol. 23, Issue 4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright 2008 WordIQ.com - Privacy Policy
::
Terms of Use
:: Contact Us
:: About Us This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "The Gulf War Did Not Take Place". |